01 — REQUIREMENT
Plain-language summary of the requirement being reviewed.
FOUR CONTROLLED CALLS · RECORDED SEPTEMBER 8, 2026
Inspect the requirement, read the evidence, and decide what is established. These are recorded calls to an AI recipient we controlled.
RECORDED OBSERVATION · MANUAL REVIEW
01 — REQUIREMENT
Plain-language summary of the requirement being reviewed.
02 — TRANSCRIPT EXCERPT
03 — PROVIDER OUTCOME
Human-readable summary of the retained provider outcome, not raw JSON.
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SUPPORTS
WHAT REMAINS UNPROVEN
SEPARATE EVIDENCE TRACK · STATIC MODEL
The appointment example only allowed a boolean. REDLINE proposes an explicit unknown outcome. This local example is separate from the four calls above; it is not a before/after runtime experiment.
ORIGINAL SCHEMA · EXCERPT
"confirmed": {
"type": "boolean"
}Two values cannot explicitly represent an unanswered question.
PROPOSED SCHEMA · EXCERPT
"confirmed": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["yes", "no", "unknown"]
}Review this contract change: downstream consumers must handle a string instead of a boolean.
Require an explicit yes or no. Do not treat a maybe, an I'll see or any other non-committal answer as agreement; if the answer is unclear, record unknown.
Excerpt of the saved proposal. Read the complete proposed task diff ↗
The verification evaluates a proposed correction in memory. It does not edit the source YAML, authenticate a real person, or test downstream applications. These are saved results, not a new execution in your browser.
REPRODUCE THE DEVELOPER WORKFLOW
Use the pinned Python source and judge instructions. Local static evaluation needs no account or phone credits.
Open reproduction instructions ↗